syncroblog: why i stayed.
7.Apr.08 | church planting, emergent, emerging church, ministry, vocation |
Revolutionaries Syncroblog.
(Read introductory post for details and more great posts on the subject)
As I looked back over 9 years of ministry (a “professional christian” as some may say) I am amazed that I’m still at it. You could say that I’m a glutton for punishment, that I tend to find myself, more often than not, in some of the worst ministry situations imaginable each progressively worse than its predecessor. It feels as if I have been continually battered and beaten, each time progressively cutting deeper and deeper into my ravaged soul. The stories of pain, and trauma becoming more and more unbelievable with each passing season. It feels as if my spirit, my heart, and my passion have been consistently abused in an attempt to destroy the fiber of hope that lay deep within. In fact, a dear friend and mentor once made the hard observation/comparison that my relationship to the traditional/institutional church is like the woman in an abusive relationship that keeps going back determined that he is going to change… So why have I stayed?
I have found myself in some of the worst situations not because I actively seek them out, but rather, because I long to see change in the church. I desperately want the traditional/institutional church to be the fully-realized, incarnational hope of the world—the beautiful bride of Christ that she was intended to be! There is a deep desire and an everlasting sense of optimism within my soul that has never quite shriveled up no matter how tough the circumstances; this keeps pushing me to see the traditional church for what she was meant to be… the embodiment of Christ on Earth revealing the mysteries of the Kingdom.
Although this eternal optimism has driven me to stay, it’s been a few key relationships in my life that has given me the proper perspective in making it through the hard times. If my friend Gentry hadn’t been there to listen and offer his prayers, allow me a place to get away from the situation and explore my dark night of the soul; if it hadn’t been for my mentor Hank and his “kick in the pants”, the constant encouragement of my parents and the support from so many others I’m not sure I would have stayed… I’m not sure I would’ve made it. The people that I allowed in, the people that I allowed to experience these things with me have been the greatest God-send of all. If it hadn’t been for them, I wouldn’t have experienced the greatest season of healing and ministry of my life.
For nearly a year I have been at Community Christian Church being allowed to heal from the past, serve on my own terms and timetable, and prepared for a new phase of ministry… planting a reproducing church in San Francisco. My experiences here have given me a new, broader sense of hope in the church, a feeling of excitement in what is next and what is possible, and a belief that the institutional church can change the world. These are the experiences that I hope to carry with me as I continue this journey in the institutional church.
Ultimately, this is why I have stayed.

Brad |
7.Apr.08 @ 3:02 pm
This was a good read.
I’m glad you’ve found a way to mediate your desire for change with your appreciation for the traditional church.
This is something that I have trouble with, but have been trying to find a way through.
-Brad
http://www.SimplyOneLife.org
jane |
7.Apr.08 @ 3:27 pm
so tell me, when you plant the next church- how will you know that you aren’t giving birth to a daughter who will welcome an abusive boyfriend?
you likened your relationship to the church as one in a battering relationship-
and believe me I feel the same love for the bride-
dysfunction gives birth to dysfunction.
So how will you give birth to something without teacing it to be abused if you remain in an abusive relationship w/the church?
How are you going to go from glory to glory with your feet stuck in mud?
This isnt meant to sound judgemental- I am honestly wondering.
The longer we stayed to change things from the inside ( with love and because all things are possible in Christ)………the more wounded we became; and the more we changed; not them.
monts |
7.Apr.08 @ 3:51 pm
Jane, you have some great questions… and honestly these are questions that I have wrestled with for a while in my desire to create something new and different, however I believe we’re coming to it from different places.
I have spent the past year in an extremely healthy church that has provided a beautiful platform for my soul to heal. I never thought it would be possible for me to have “healed” in such short order, however God has worked thoroughly in my life to continually bring about a restoration of my heart and spirit. It has been this season of ministry that has allowed me to get “unstuck” from the mud, take a step back and see the church in a new light. I have seen the possibilities, and I have seen what it can be like. I believe that this will serve as a launching pad for creating a new and healthy community that is committed to changing the world.
Now, that may sound “nice and fluffy” but there’s more to it than that because I will have many people surrounding me from the outside of this endeavor from healthy churches around the country that will coach me, encourage me, set me straight, and hold me accountable to making sure that I am not “giving birth to a daughter welcoming in an abusive boyfriend” (great metaphor, btw!)
The final thought is that as the lead planter it is my responsibility to create the culture of the church (perhaps one of the more intimidating aspects of church planting) and I continue to think through what the culture of this new community will look like. It is with great attention to the culture of the new community that we can make sure we stay healthy, continually moving forward, and always maintaining the proper perspective—Jesus.
Thanks for the questions! And thanks for reminding me to think through them!
Jason Ellis |
7.Apr.08 @ 4:33 pm
Even though that unique church may seem extremely healthy, what bothers me about replication is the environment around it changes drastically. Thus why I like how Rob and the team at Mars Hill is very admanant about not following their approach.
I think Jane is right in many ways, and it is what worries me the most about the whole multi-site, church replication fad that seems to be happening across America. I mean really how different is it than a program from Willow or Saddleback that many of us cant stand.
I dont question Community because I dont go there, and I do believe in the work you are doing aaron, so dont take it as a total blast to them. They are just questions I wonder about going forward.
I think church plants and house churches are essential, I am just hoping we (as in this new generation of church) don’t think streamlining church into a factory line is an answer.
PS - Also not saying you are trying to replicate Community piece by piece, more just questioning the thought well this church is completely healthy my church I plant from that will be too.
monts |
7.Apr.08 @ 4:41 pm
Jason, flesh out the thought:
“what bothers me about replication is the environment around it changes drastically.”
I’m not tracking with you on that (just trying to understand.) I’m not talking replication, I’m talking reproduction… they’re two totally different things.
I don’t see the multi-site approach or reproduction as a program, but rather the DNA of the church. If the church (global) never reproduced in any way, then we wouldn’t be here today. There would be no house churches, no institutional church… no church period… it would’ve died a quick death.
I hear your heart and know where you’re coming from in the “stream-lined” approach to creating church… it’s certainly a far cry from a more organic, grass-roots approach in allowing community to happen, but multi-site isn’t a “stream-lined” approach. In fact, I think you might be surprised at how organic it really is!
glenn |
7.Apr.08 @ 5:43 pm
Aaron ~
Thanks for jumping into the fray. Maybe I can do a of the fleshing out of some of Jason’s comments. In reproduction, one gives birth to children who often are so different, one would think they are from different parents. Reproduction allows individuals to grow up to be themselves, not clones of their parents.
What if a church has some bad DNA? Why pass it on?
Church planting and reproduction efforts of individual churches and church planting organizations are not he only way the church moves forward and begins more local assemblies. It also happens as a result of persecution and frustration, perhaps more effectively.
I am at a loss for words to explain how corporate style church gives me the willys. I think it is the thinking that we have things figured out and can systematize it and reproduce it like a McDonald’s franchise. Findings such as the Reveal study are indicating that the end result wasn’t what we hoped for.
Revolutionaries Synchroblog: Harvey « re-dreaming the dream |
7.Apr.08 @ 6:01 pm
[...] Aaron Monts: Why I Stayed [...]
Jason |
7.Apr.08 @ 8:07 pm
What I mean by the environment is simply, Zion isnt Naperville, just as Lake Forest isnt North Chicago, just as Illinois isnt california and so on. So approaches that seem certain to work in one site may fail greatly somewhere else. We see this in denominations as a whole.
I grew up in the Free Methodist church and while that denomination is dying a slow death in the midwest, it is flourishing in the Northwest and some in the Northeast. Are their doctrines different? Nope the same.
I think the church will never die if Jesus is the core. Take our house church, 22 people from all age groups, from all walks of life, nothing we learned in the denominations or in one case no denomination backed our creation of our community. But yet we seem to be more and more amazed at the opportunities God has given us to serve and be served. It really has been amazing.
I also look at Willow to some extent. Some people I know rather well were on board with one of their mutlisite locations. However when it came to a point where there community was drastically different than that of Barrington, the mutli site focus (at least in the minds of this leader I knew) felt like it needed to stray from the main church. But through church politics and programming, that would not happen. Thus he left and is now at a different congregation serving as he thought in best light of that immediate community.
I worry when one church seems to have it “nailed” down then tries to replicate that in other locations that have a far different outreach than that of their own.
Glenn and I talked about the uniqueness of Lake County here last Friday. How you can take the train from state line and go from the blue collar worker, to a mixed ethnic lower income class, to a high latin american race, to an extremely poor village, to an armed forces stop, to a very upscale stop, all within the first handful of train stops. Amazing. Thus I believe many of the reasons churches are abundant in this little corner of the US and still populating.
I do believe in your work and do believe you to be on to something, but the conversation must be had on what I see as the current fad of multiplying your local church as an exact replica elsewhere. I think that have to be different just like the analogy of the body of Christ. The hand to the finger, to the leg to the foot, etc.
I am definitely intrigued to see how SF unfolds for you guys though, and I dont wish any bad will on you at all. Its not that, more just wanting to keep the conversation open on multi-site and church spin offs. I’m not sold on this venture yet.
monts |
7.Apr.08 @ 8:24 pm
I completely agree with you, but again I’m not talking about replication… I’m talking about reproduction. Two vastly different approaches.
Multi-site that works in distinctly different cultural areas has within its core a culture, a DNA of reproduction… not replication. It’s not about carbon-copying church, it’s about moving the gospel into a new area and contextualizing the new community (church) to make the greatest impact… reproducing. (John MacArthur’s hair is standing up on the back of his neck right now!)
Cory |
7.Apr.08 @ 8:27 pm
Aaron,
I have a hard time…a REALLY hard time with Pastors who complain about how hard ministry is. I’ve been there…did the lock-ins, retreats, taken the heat at meetings, been blamed for one of my teenagers getting pregnant (not blamed for GETTING her pregnant, but blamed for letting a good christian girl go bad). I was in a traditional (as in 1950’s/60’s Bill Gaither livin’ - not truly traditional)church that was living in the good ole’ days completely irrelevant to the world around it. My job as youth/associate pastor was to keep the students under control, out of trouble, and have some kids saved every now and then.
So I left. I said ‘Screw you, I’ll get a secular job and make something happen, cause I’m better than this church, I’m going to go do something really important. So here I am, 4 years later, making more than twice what I made there. And I HATE it. You think churches are messed up? Try the coporate world. You think that church makes you participate in stupid rituals and useless activities? Try corporate. Try losing the right to be creative.
I would give almost anything to hear that calling again from God to be back in the church full time, but it hasn’t come and I don’t know if I ever will again…I don’t think I could take it in conscience, with my current church views.
And this is harder than any pain I ever felt in ministry. I used to complain about how busy I was, and how much I worked in ministry. Then, all of a sudden I was on the flip side - working 50-60 hours, raising a family, AND trying to attend all of the church meetings, band practices, and prayer meetings. It was much worse, and much more stressful.
I know ministry can be hard, but I also know that it’s easy to lose touch with the other side and to believe that your job is hard and more demanding than the rest of the world. Sometimes pride and arrogance slips in, sometimes it seems lke a good idea to just take off and get a job roofing, or in construction, or selling guitars….
monts |
7.Apr.08 @ 8:42 pm
Cory,
No disrespect, but the pain that I’ve faced is a lot different than dealing with parents, doing lock-ins, intense meetings, being in irrelevant church, and working long hours. I wouldn’t consider that to be hard… that’s normal. I in no way meant to elevate my situation above anyone else’s, nor was I complaining. Rather I was attempting to express the depth of these wounds that I have faced and yet communicate that there still is hope and that’s why I’m still at it.
I’m not comfortable posting my experiences online for the world to see and pass around, but if you would like to know please feel free to email me and I’ll tell you as much as you’d like to know… then maybe you can grasp a bit of what I’m talking about.
gentry13 |
7.Apr.08 @ 9:56 pm
i’m proud to journey forward with you. your friendship means more to me than you know.
pax.
kathyescobar |
7.Apr.08 @ 11:45 pm
aaron, just saw your link added to glenn’s list. i am glad for the thoughts you shared and that you stayed…i think it’s so important that some go out, some stay behind. we need new thinkers everywhere and if we all just “leave” then who can help influence what’s already there? i wish you all the best on the next leg of your journey…kathy
Cory |
8.Apr.08 @ 7:44 am
oh, so it’s related to being a Cubs fan then, I take it?
I didn’t mean disrespect either. I did go on a personal rant related to my own experiences and I assumed that your experiences are similar, but I really meant it more as a way of saying ‘Please keep in mind that the pain and frustration only happen in the church.’ I hear a lot of Pastors who seem to think that all of the pain and anxiety they face in the church is something that people working outside of the church don’t deal with and don’t understand.
I’m glad to hear you are in a Church that is a part of helping you find healing.
Jason |
8.Apr.08 @ 10:16 am
When we start getting to the point about who is doing ministry full time and who isnt, that’s the real shame. Everything is spiritual isnt it!
glenn |
8.Apr.08 @ 11:27 am
Aaron ~
It’s been interesting to read the conversation going on here because I know all, but a couple of the people who have commented.It seems like kind of an old conversation/debate about multi site/house church,
institutional/organic,
professional/volunteer. I have pretty much lost faith in the institutional church, but not totally. There are some great things happening in some churches that humble and amaze me, and certainty don’t fit my paradigm. Part of the reason for my lose of faith in church as we have known it stems from my personal experiences, just like your confidence stems from your recent experiences. I like to challenge you because you can take it. I have always had a lot of confidence in you and wish you well. My conclusion:we each need to be true to our calling and love those who differ. Can I get an “amen”?
//re:generate » Blog Archive » the next wave (why i stayed) |
26.Apr.08 @ 11:28 am
[...] is now online, and if you scroll down you may notice an article on there written by me taken from a blog post written a few weeks [...]